Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Adaptive Statistical Quality Assessment and Enhancement of Infrared and Optical Remote Sensing Imagery for Intelligent Environmental Monitoring in Real?Time

Abstract

Infrared and optical remote sensing imagery plays a critical role in environmental applications such as wildfire detection, urban thermal profiling, climate monitoring, and sustainable resource management. Nevertheless, sensor noise, low contrast, motion blur, and atmospheric clutter usually affect the utility of such data, reducing its usefulness in real-time environmental monitoring and intelligent visual analytics. To address these challenges, the paper suggests a new adaptive statistical quality profiling and refinement architecture with future functionality in real time work of infrared and optical satellite images. The proposed framework incorporates the modeling of the temporal-spatial consistency with adaptive histogram-based statistical assessments and edge-preserving denoising techniques to reconstruct degraded scenes and deliver high-fidelity outcomes. The system can be used as a diagnostic layer in intelligent visual analytics pipelines as well as an enhancement module by incorporating both perceptual quality measures and statistical measures. Experiments on Sentinel and Landsat images indicate that the quantitative metrics are significantly enhanced: PSNR was improved to 29.8 dB and 32.3 dB when using an IR data and 24.1 dB and 26.5 dB when using an RGB optical data respectively. Similarly, SSIM, BRISque and NIQE increased by over 30 meaning that there was an improvement in perceptions. The framework not only is rapid in image fidelity, but also satisfies near real time performance, and can sustain throughput of up to 25 fps with GPU-accelerated inference and maintains the mean latency low, at less than 50 ms. These findings support the scalability of the given approach to the edge deployment within the process of satellite and ground-station. In addition to technical efficiency, the enhancements have a direct positive impact on environmental monitoring, making it possible to track the location of the hotspots of wildfires much better, haze less effectively to analyze air quality, and profile urban heat islands. In general, the research paper reflects a viable and scalable quality diagnostics and improvement system that facilitates sustainable environmental monitoring, smart visual analytics, and real-time Earth observation decision-making.

Keywords

Infrared image enhancement, optical remote sensing, real-time image processing, statistical quality assessment, intelligent visual analytics, environmental monitoring

PDF

References

  1. Zhang, L., & Zhang, L. (2022). Artificial intelligence for remote sensing data analysis: A review of challenges and opportunities. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 10(2), 270-294. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2022.3145854
  2. Xu, Y., Du, B., Zhang, L., Cerra, D., Pato, M., Carmona, E., ... & Le Saux, B. (2019). Advanced multi-sensor optical remote sensing for urban land use and land cover classification: Outcome of the 2018 IEEE GRSS data fusion contest. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(6), 1709-1724. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2911113
  3. Mohanty, M., Rath, P. S., Mohapatra, A. G., Mohanty, A., & Nayak, S. (2024). Terahertz waves in biomedicine: Pioneering imaging and sensing for healthcare revolution. In Next Generation Wireless Communication: Advances in Optical, mm-Wave, and THz Technologies (pp. 341-360). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56144-3_21
  4. Paheding, S., Saleem, A., Siddiqui, M. F. H., Rawashdeh, N., Essa, A., & Reyes, A. A. (2024). Advancing horizons in remote sensing: a comprehensive survey of deep learning models and applications in image classification and beyond. Neural Computing and Applications, 36(27), 16727-16767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10165-7
  5. Dash, P. K. (2024). Remote sensing as a potential tool for advancing digital soil mapping. In Remote Sensing of Soils (pp. 357-370). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18773-5.00021-1
  6. Shanmugam, V., & Shanmugam, P. (2025). Retrieval of water-leaving radiance from UAS-based hyperspectral remote sensing data in coastal waters. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2025.2513545
  7. Liu, A., Shi, W., Safari, M., Liu, W., & Cao, J. (2024). Design guidelines for optical camera communication systems: A tutorial. IEEE Photonics Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2024.3424885
  8. Hill, P., Anantrasirichai, N., Achim, A., & Bull, D. (2025). Deep learning techniques for atmospheric turbulence removal: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(4), 101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-11086-6
  9. Boulogeorgos, A. A. A., Trevlakis, S. E., Tegos, S. A., Papanikolaou, V. K., & Karagiannidis, G. K. (2020). Machine learning in nano-scale biomedical engineering. IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological, and Multi-Scale Communications, 7(1), 10-39. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMBMC.2020.3035383
  10. Rehman, M. U., Nizami, I. F., Ullah, F., & Hussain, I. (2024). IQA Vision Transformed: A Survey of Transformer Architectures in Perceptual Image Quality Assessment. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3506273
  11. Zhou, M., Shen, W., Wei, X., Luo, J., Jia, F., Zhuang, X., & Jia, W. (2025). Blind image quality assessment: Exploring content fidelity perceptibility via quality adversarial learning. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-024-02338-7
  12. Liao, X., Wei, X., Zhou, M., Li, Z., & Kwong, S. (2024). Image quality assessment: Measuring perceptual degradation via distribution measures in deep feature spaces. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 33, 4044-4059. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2024.3409176
  13. He, Q., Yang, E., & Fang, S. (2024). A survey on human profile information inference via wireless signals. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 26(4), 2577-2610. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2024.3373397
  14. Chen, C. C., Khorassani, K. S., Kuncham, G. K. R., Vaidya, R., Abduljabbar, M., Shafi, A., ... & Panda, D. K. (2023, May). Implementing and optimizing a gpu-aware mpi library for intel gpus: Early experiences. In 2023 IEEE/ACM 23rd International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Internet Computing (CCGrid) (pp. 131-140). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGrid57682.2023.00022
  15. Sowmya, A., & Trinder, J. (2000). Modelling and representation issues in automated feature extraction from aerial and satellite images. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, 55(1), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00040-4
  16. Affek, M., & Szyma?ski, J. (2024). A survey on the datasets and algorithms for satellite data applications. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3424954
  17. Kumari, N., Sharma, P., & Kansal, I. (2023, February). An analytical review on image enhancement techniques. In 2023 2nd Edition of IEEE Delhi Section Flagship Conference (DELCON) (pp. 1-10). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DELCON57910.2023.10127353
  18. Zhou, J., Yao, J., Zhang, W., & Zhang, D. (2022). Multi-scale retinex-based adaptive gray-scale transformation method for underwater image enhancement. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 81(2), 1811-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11327-8
  19. He, K., Sun, J., & Tang, X. (2012). Guided image filtering. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 35(6), 1397-1409. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2012.213
  20. Attya, M., Abo-Seida, O. M., Abdulkader, H. M., & Mohammed, A. M. (2025). A hybrid deep learning approach for accurate water body segmentation in satellite imagery. Earth Science Informatics, 18(2), 418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-01912-y
  21. Saoud, L. S., Elmezain, M., Sultan, A., Heshmat, M., Seneviratne, L., & Hussain, I. (2024). Seeing Through the Haze: A Comprehensive Review of Underwater Image Enhancement Techniques. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3465550
  22. Ige, A. O., & Sibiya, M. (2024). State-of-the-art in 1d convolutional neural networks: A survey. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3433513
  23. Mittal, A., Moorthy, A. K., & Bovik, A. C. (2012). No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Transactions on image processing, 21(12), 4695-4708. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2012.2214050
  24. Huang, C. H., & Wu, J. L. (2023, October). CPIPS: Learning to preserve perceptual distances in End-to-End image compression. In 2023 Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC) (pp. 1705-1711). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIPAASC58517.2023.10317329
  25. Gao, Y., Min, X., Zhu, Y., Zhang, X. P., & Zhai, G. (2023). Blind image quality assessment: A fuzzy neural network for opinion score distribution prediction. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 34(3), 1641-1655. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2023.3295375

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 84

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.