Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)

Standard Journal Issues

A Computational Framework and Pipeline Architecture for Sustainable Online Consumer Behavior

Published 2025-11-21

  • Nikita Panwar
    • ,
  • Dasharathraj k shetty
    • ,
  • Sandeep S Shenoy
    • ,
  • Anusha Pai

Nikita Panwar
Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India

Dasharathraj k shetty
Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India

Sandeep S Shenoy
Manipal School of Commerce and Economics, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India

Anusha Pai
Department of Accommodations operations, Welcomgroup Graduate School of Hotel Administration, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India

Abstract

This study proposes a design-oriented computational framework and pipeline architecture for e-commerce systems to address the gap between pro-environmental attitudes and sustainable purchase behaviors. Despite growing availability of green personal care products (GPCP) on e-commerce platforms, consumer engagement remains limited. Prior studies often overlook this niche, focusing instead on broader green product categories or offline retail contexts. This study also addresses the gap by examining how pro-environmental and consumption values shape consumer behavior for GPCPs in digital commerce, and then translates the validated determinants into a computational design. A quantitative design guided by the Value–Attitude–Behavior framework was employed. Data were collected from 302 consumers who purchased GPCPs online in the past six months. Constructs were measured using validated scales and analyzed through Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). The empirically significant determinants were then mapped into a multi-stage pipeline architecture to demonstrate how behavioral factors can be operationalized within e-commerce systems. The findings indicate that emotional value, functional quality value, and perceived environmental knowledge significantly shape positive consumer attitudes toward GPCPs in e-commerce settings. Green purchase attitudes were strongly predictive of purchase intentions (? = 0.781, p < 0.000), which subsequently influenced actual purchase behavior (? = 0.726, p < 0.000). These empirically validated determinants inform the computational pipeline, where values act as inputs, attitudes and intentions as intermediate system states, and behaviors as measurable outcomes. Theoretically, this study advances the Value–Attitude–Behavior framework by confirming the distinct and context-dependent roles of emotional and functional quality values, as well as environmental knowledge, in shaping sustainable consumer attitudes in digital contexts. Practically, by integrating these behavioral insights into a pipeline design, the study contributes a computational framework that links consumer psychology with system architecture.

Keywords

pipeline architecture, e-commerce, computational framework, Sustainable online purchasing, SDG12

PDF

References

  1. B. Gajdzik, K. Bartu?, M. Jaciow, R. Wolniak, R. Wolny, and W. W. Grebski, “Evolution of Polish E-Consumers’ Environmental Awareness and Purchasing Behavior over Ten Years,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 4686–4686, May 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114686.
  2. A. Müller, z. Bács, v. Fenyves, s. Kovács, a. Lengyel, and é. B. Bácsné, “Demographic Influences On Environmental Attitudes And Actions: An Analysis Of The Attitude-Behavior Gap,” Geoj. Tour. Geosites, vol. 60, no. 2 supplement, pp. 1028–1040, Jun. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.602spl01-1477.
  3. C. Luthra, Pankaj Deshwal, Shiksha Kushwah, and Samir Gokarn, “‘Exploring barriers towards green personal care products purchase: an integrated ISM-MICMAC approach,’” Int. J. Pharm. Healthc. Mark., Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijphm-05-2024-0045.
  4. R. Testa, F. Vella, G. Rizzo, G. Schifani, and G. Migliore, “What drives and obstacles the intention to purchase green skincare products? A study of the Italian market of green skincare products,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 484, no. 144358, p. 144358, Nov. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144358.
  5. R. E. Dodson, B. Cardona, A. R. Zota, J. Robinson Flint, S. Navarro, and B. Shamasunder, “Personal care product use among diverse women in California: Taking Stock Study,” J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 487–502, May 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-021-00327-3.
  6. N. Singh, B. Rawat, D. S. Chaubey, A. P. Mani, and A. Singh, “Understanding the Dynamics of consumer behaviour and purchase intentions for Green Cosmetic Products in North India: A Gender-Neutral Approach,” F1000Res., vol. 13, no. 611, pp. 611–611, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.151629.2.
  7. J. Oláh, J. Popp, M. A. Khan, and N. Kitukutha, “Sustainable e-commerce and environmental impact on sustainability,” Econ. Sociol., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 85–105, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2023/16-1/6.
  8. A. G. Cossatin, N. Mauro, and L. Ardissono, "Promoting green fashion consumption through digital nudges in recommender systems," IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 6812–6829, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3349710
  9. G. Spillo, A. De Filippo, C. Musto, M. Milano, and G. Semeraro, "Comparing data reduction strategies for energy-efficient green recommender systems," Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, pp. 1–27, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-025-00965-1
  10. Jing, H., & Xiaona, C. (2023). Research on the Construction of Trusted Main-side Multi-chain Green Food Traceability Platform Based on Blockchain. Shipin gongye ke-ji, 44(14), 411-418, doi: https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070391
  11. N. Choudhury, R. Mukherjee, R. Yadav, Y. Liu, and W. Wang, “Can machine learning approaches predict green purchase intention?—A study from Indian consumer perspective,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 456, p. 142218, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142218
  12. A. Munde and J. Kaur, “Predictive modelling of customer sustainable jewelry purchases using machine learning algorithms,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 235, pp. 683–700, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.04.066
  13. P. Huyn, A. Kumar, and S. Peng, “Personalizing consumer interventions through leveraging behavioral economics,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 207, pp. 282–291, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.061
  14. M. R. Maarif, M. Syafrudin, and N. L. Fitriyani, “Uncovering sustainability insights from Amazon’s eco-friendly product reviews for design optimization,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 172, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010172
  15. R. K. Behera, P. K. Bala, and N. P. Rana, “Creation of sustainable growth with explainable artificial intelligence: An empirical insight from consumer packaged goods retailers,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 399, p. 136605, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136605
  16. C. Chen, D. Li, J. Qian, and Z. Li, “The Impact of Green Purchase Intention on Compensatory Consumption: The Regulatory Role of Pro-Environmental Behavior,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 18, pp. 8183–8183, Sep. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188183.
  17. R. McLoughlin, M. McDonnell, and D. McEvoy, “The Impact of 3D and AR Product Presentation on Mental Imagery, Product Uncertainty and User Experience,” in Lecture notes in networks and systems, Springer International Publishing, Jan. 2024, pp. 425–443. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73110-5_28.
  18. A. Shaban, Anastasiya Saraeva, S. Rose, and M. Clark, “The invisible hand of touch: Testing a tactile sensation?choice satisfaction model in online shopping,” J. Sens. Stud., vol. 39, no. 1, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12897.
  19. Z. Robichaud, B. M. Brand, and H. Yu, “Bridging the information asymmetry in e-commerce: an intercultural perspective on sustainable clothing,” Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag., vol. 52(10/11), no. 1004–1019, Aug. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-12-2023-0708.
  20. P. M. L. Ng et al., “The impact of social media exposure and online peer networks on green purchase behavior,” Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 165, no. 108517, p. 108517, Nov. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108517.
  21. P. M. Homer and L. R. Kahle, “A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 638–646, 1988, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.638.
  22. S. Sonkar, P. Singh, and R. Singh Dubey, “Examining the Consumer Behavior and Preferences of Generation Y and Generation Z Toward Green Cosmetics in the Indian Market,” J. Glob. Mark., pp. 1–22, Jun. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2025.2518091.
  23. Y. Rossanty and M. D. T. P. Nasution, “Eco-Friendly Fashion and Personal Values: Revealing the Hidden Forces behind Attitudes and Purchase Intentions,” Int. Rev. Manag. Mark., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 32–44, Feb. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.17900.
  24. O. Essiz, S. Yurteri, C. Mandrik, and A. Senyuz, “Exploring the Value-Action Gap in Green Consumption: Roles of Risk Aversion, Subjective Knowledge, and Gender Differences,” J. Glob. Mark., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–26, Aug. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2022.2116376.
  25. A. Renaldi, S. R. H. Hati, E. Ghazali, U. Sumarwan, and T. Ramayah, “The determinants of customer loyalty in the sharing economy: a study of the largest local food delivery apps in Indonesia,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 11, no. 1, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2364055.
  26. M. Pourvaziri, S. Mahmoudkelayeh, S. Kamranfar, A. M. Fathollahi-Fard, M. Gheibi, and A. Kumar, “Barriers to green procurement of the Iranian construction industry: an interpretive structural modeling approach,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 3599–3616, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05346-1.
  27. A. Kumbargeri and S. Tripathi, “Price green inference: The role of green = higher production cost lay belief,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 194, no. 115382, p. 115382, Apr. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115382.
  28. T. Hu, A. Al Mamun, M. N. H. Reza, M. Wu, and Q. Yang, “Examining consumers’ willingness to pay premium price for organic food,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, Sep. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03789-6.
  29. S. N. Khan and M. Mohsin, “The power of emotional value: Exploring the effects of values on green product consumer choice behavior,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 150, no. 0959-6526, pp. 65–74, May 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.187.
  30. Y. Wang, Y. Li, J. Zhang, and X. Su, “How impacting factors affect Chinese green purchasing behavior based on Fuzzy Cognitive Maps,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 240, no. 118199, p. 118199, Dec. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118199.
  31. T. Handriana, M. Kurniawati, S. S. Sangadji, F. Wurjaningrum, and I. B. Suryaningsih, “Antecedents and Consequences of Green Trust in Environmentally Friendly Cosmetic Products,” Int. J. Environ. Impacts., vol. 7, no. 4, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijei.070412.
  32. M. Chaudhary and N. S. Kola, “Consumers Behavior Towards Green Marketing of Cosmetics,” Advances in marketing, customer relationship management, and e-services book series, pp. 131–158, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9959-0.ch006.
  33. S. N. Alsubari, S. N. Deshmukh, T. H. H. Aldhyani, A. Nefaie, and M. Alrasheedi, “Rule-Based Classifiers for Identifying Fake Reviews in E-commerce: A Deep Learning System,” Forum Interdiscip. Math., pp. 257–276, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8566-9_14.
  34. H. Zhao, F. Furuoka, R. A. Rasiah, and E. Shen, “Consumers’ Purchase Intention toward Electric Vehicles from the Perspective of Perceived Green Value: An Empirical Survey from China,” World Electr. Veh. J., vol. 15, no. 6, p. 267, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15060267.
  35. J. Liu and S. Chelliah, “Personal Brand and Consumer Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Perceived Emotional Value,” J. Ecohumanism., vol. 4, no. 1, Feb. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.6253.
  36. I-Tung. Shih, A. D. K. Silalahi, K. Baljir, and S. Jargalsaikhan, “Exploring the impact of perceived sustainability on customer satisfaction and the mediating role of perceived value,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 11, no. 1, Nov. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2431647.
  37. L.-S. Ling, S. Yi, K. Y. M. Lee, P.-S. Ling, and A. M. A. Edwin, “Do Environmental-Related Factors Stimulate Consumers’ Green Cosmetic Purchase Intention?,” Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan., vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 2605–2614, Jul. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190717.
  38. L. Dessart and V. Pitardi, “How stories generate consumer engagement: An exploratory study,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 104, no. 104, pp. 183–195, Nov. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.045.
  39. N. Rasheed, R. I. Sabir, H. Mahmood, A. Rauf, A. M. Ibrahim, and W. Naseem, “Impact of pro-environmental values on sustainable green apparel buying behavior in Pakistan,” Clean. Responsible Consum., vol. 12, no. 100180, p. 100180, Feb. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2024.100180.
  40. S. Stojanova, M. Ze?evi?, and B. Culiberg, “From Words to Deeds: How Do Knowledge, Effectiveness, and Personal Relevance Link Environmental Concern and Buying Behavior?,” J. Nonprofit Public Sect. Mark., vol. 35(4), no. 329–353, pp. 1–25, Jul. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2021.1953671.
  41. S. Balaskas, A. Panagiotarou, and M. Rigou, “Impact of Environmental Concern, Emotional Appeals, and Attitude toward the Advertisement on the Intention to Buy Green Products: The Case of Younger Consumer Audiences,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 17, pp. 13204–13204, Sep. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713204.
  42. D. Manika, S. Papagiannidis, M. Bourlakis, and R. M. Clarke, “Drawing on Subjective Knowledge and Information Receptivity to Examine an Environmental Sustainability Policy: Insights from the UK’s Bag Charge Policy,” Eur. Manag. Rev., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 249–262, Feb. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12453.
  43. G. Akandere and A. Gümrah, “The Green Purchase Behavior of Young Consumers: The Role of Environmental Knowledge,” Folia Oecon. Stetin., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–21, Jun. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2025-0001.
  44. I. Kovacs and E. R. Keresztes, “Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Willingness to Pay for Credence Product Attributes of Sustainable Foods,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 4338, Apr. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074338.
  45. M. Mansoor, T. M. Awan, and O. S. Paracha, “Sustainable buying behaviour: An interplay of consumers’ engagement in sustainable consumption and social norms,” Int. Soc. Sci. J., vol. 72, no. 246, pp. 1053–1070, Sep. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12372.
  46. G. Grunwald, A. Kara, and J. E. Spillan, “Involvement matters: navigating the value–action gap in business students’ sustainability transformation expectations—a cross-country Kano study,” Sustain. Sci., pp. 1–23, Apr. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-025-01681-z.
  47. I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior,” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, 1991, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
  48. J. F. Hair Jr, M. Sarstedt, L. Hopkins, and V. G. Kuppelwieser, “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM),” Eur. Bus. Rev., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 106–121, Mar. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.
  49. A. Niedermeier, A. Emberger?Klein, and K. Menrad, “Which factors distinguish the different consumer segments of green fast?moving consumer goods in Germany?,” Bus. Strat. Environ., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1823–1838, Jan. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2718.
  50. D. Jaiswal, V. Kaushal, P. K. Singh, and A. Biswas, “Green Market Segmentation and Consumer profiling: a Cluster Approach to an Emerging Consumer Market,” Benchmarking, vol. 28, no. 3, Nov. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-05-2020-0247.
  51. L. Wang, Q. Zhang, and P. P. W. Wong, “Purchase Intention for Green Cars Among Chinese Millennials: Merging the Value–Attitude–Behavior Theory and Theory of Planned Behavior,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, Feb. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.786292.
  52. S. Yu and J. Lee, “The Effects of Consumers’ Perceived Values on Intention to Purchase Upcycled Products,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 1034, Feb. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041034.
  53. P. Kamalanon, J.-S. Chen, and T.-T.-Y. Le, “‘Why Do We Buy Green Products?’ an Extended Theory of the Planned Behavior Model for Green Product Purchase Behavior,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 689, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020689.
  54. Md. Nekmahmud and M. Fekete-Farkas, “Why Not Green Marketing? Determinates of Consumers’ Intention to Green Purchase Decision in a New Developing Nation,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 19, p. 7880, Sep. 2020, Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/7880
  55. P. Kumar and B. M. Ghodeswar, “Factors affecting consumers’ green product purchase decisions,” Marketing Intelligence & Planning, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 330–347, 2015, doi: 10.1108/mip-03-2014-0068.
  56. N. Sreen, S. Purbey, and P. Sadarangani, “Impact of culture, behavior and gender on green purchase intention,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 41, pp. 177–189, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.12.002.
  57. J. F. Hair, M. Page, and N. Brunsveld, Essentials of Business Research Methods. Routledge, 2019. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780429203374
  58. C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” J. Mark. Res., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–50, Feb. 1981, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
  59. P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, “Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 879–903, 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
  60. L. Hu and P. M. Bentler, “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives,” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–55, 1999, doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
  61. S. A. V. Simão, S. F. Rohden, and D. C. Pinto, “Natural claims and sustainability: The role of perceived efficacy and sensorial expectations,” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 34, no. 505–517, pp. 505–517, Nov. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.09.026.
  62. A. A. Najm, S. A. Salih, S. Fazry, D. Law, and A. Azfaralariff, “Moderated mediation approach to determine the effect of natural packaging factors on intention to purchase natural skincare products among the population of Klang Valley, Malaysia,” J. Sens. Stud., vol. 38(2), no. e12811, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12811.
  63. T. Suphasomboon and S. Vassanadumrongdee, “Toward sustainable consumption of green cosmetics and personal care products: The role of perceived value and ethical concern,” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 33, no. 2352–5509, pp. 230–243, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.07.004.
  64. R. Ladhari and N. M. Tchetgna, “Values, socially conscious behaviour and consumption emotions as predictors of Canadians’ intent to buy fair trade products,” Int. J. Consum. Stud., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 696–705, Jul. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12382.
  65. J. M. Hong, R. E. Lim, and L. Atkinson, “‘Doing Good’ versus ‘Being Good’: The interplay between pride appeals and regulatory?focused messages in green advertising,” J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., vol. 51(11), no. 1089–1108, Aug. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12826.
  66. W. H. H. Cooray, S. S. J. Patabendige, and U. J. Mirando, “Impact of Environmental Knowledge on Green Purchase Intention: Examining the Mediating Effect of Young Business Executives’ Attitudes Towards Green Products in Developing Country Context,” Sri Lanka J. Mark., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 261–284, Feb. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.4038/sljmuok.v9i3.159.
  67. A. Manopo, W. J. F. A. Tumbuan, and E. M. Gunawan, “The Influence Of Product Knowledge On Green Purchase Intention, The Role Of Attitude As Mediating Variable,” J. EMBA, vol. 9(4), no. 851–864, Oct. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v9i4.36623.
  68. B. Kaur, V. P. Gangwar, G. Dash, N. Khan, and A. A. Alkhoraif, “‘Our Planet, Our Health’ - Impact of Health Consciousness and Environmental Concern on Green Purchase Behavior: Role of Reference Groups,” Pol. J. Environ. Stud., vol. 33(2), no. 1191–1202, Nov. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/172037.
  69. I. U. Jan, S. Ji, and C. Yeo, “Values and Green Product Purchase Behavior: The Moderating Effects of the Role of Government and Media Exposure,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 23, p. 6642, Nov. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236642.
  70. D. Ghorbanzadeh, M. A. Khan, M. Lucia, K. Prasad, D. Abduvalieva, and M. Alexandra, “From attitude to action: examining the factors affecting sustainable purchasing behavior in Generation Z with an emphasis on environmental responsibility,” Environ. Dev. Sustain., Apr. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06141-3.
  71. M. R. Mayekar and K. G. Sankaranarayanan, “Values as predictors of consumers’ green product purchase behaviour,” Int. J. Green Econ., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 1, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijge.2019.101443.
  72. R. Zhang, Q. Ma, and D. Guan, “The impact of financial scarcity on green consumption: Sequential mediating effects of anxiety and self?efficacy,” Psychol. Mark., vol. 40(6), no. 1162–1178, Mar. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21801.
  73. E. Kirchler, F. Fischer, and E. Hölzl, “Price and its Relation to Objective and Subjective Product Quality: Evidence from the Austrian Market,” J. Consum. Policy., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 275–286, Jun. 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-010-9138-1.
  74. S. Shukla and R. Sanjeev, “Exploring Feminine Hygiene Product Adoption: a Gynecologists’ Perspective in India. Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to Women’s Buying Behavior,” Soc. Mark. Q., vol. 30, no. 1, Feb. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/15245004241233835.
  75. M. A. Farage, A. Katsarou, and H. I. Maibach, “Sensory, clinical and physiological factors in sensitive skin: a review,” Contact Dermatitis, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 1–14, Jul. 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00886.x.
  76. K. Sanjay, S. Tewari, and A. N. Subbarao, “Bridging the Attitude–Behavior Gap in Green Marketing: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Psychological and Environmental Influences,” in In Green Marketing Perspectives, Emerald Publishing Limited, 2025, p. (pp. 53-67), doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83608-772-420251004
  77. D. Van Hoang and T. Le Thanh, “Relationship Between Environmental Concern, Green Perceived Value and Green Purchase Behaviour: The Moderating Role of Price Consciousness,” Organ. Mark. Emerg. Econ., vol. 15, no. 2(31), pp. 248–287, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.15388/omee.2024.15.12.
  78. K. W. K. Chu, “The green gap of high-involvement purchasing decisions: an exploratory study,” Asian J. Bus. Ethics., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 371–394, Nov. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-020-00115-6.
  79. N. B. Nguyen and T. D. Duong, “Examining the impact of greenwashing on customer boycott intentions: the mediating role of green confusion,” Discov. Sustain., vol. 6, no. 1, May 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01337-z.
  80. I. Rizomyliotis, “Consumer Trust and Online Purchase Intention for Sustainable Products,” Am. Behav. Sci., Mar. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241236174.
  81. J. N. Sheth, B. I. Newman, and B. L. Gross, “Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 159–170, Mar. 1991, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8.
  82. Chen, M. F. (2024). Integrating the value–belief–norm model and the theory of planned behavior for explaining consumers’ purchase intention of suboptimal food. British Food Journal, 126(9), 3483-3504, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2024-0426
  83. Wang, L., Gong, Y., Zhang, Q., Sun, R., Wong, P. P. W., & Zhou, W. W. (2024). Merging the theory of planned behaviour and value-belief-norm theory to predict green hotel visit intention among Chinese university students: the case from Xuzhou, China. Acta Psychologica, 251, 104627, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104627
  84. Nassanbekova, S., Yeshenkulova, G., Nurguzhina, A., & Ibadildin, N. (2024). Green Product Purchase Intention of Young Customers from Developing Country: Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 19(9), doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190931
  85. Srivastava, S., Raniga, U. I., & Misra, S. (2021). A methodological framework for life cycle sustainability assessment of construction projects incorporating TBL and decoupling principles. Sustainability, 14(1), 197, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010197.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 38

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.