Physics-Informed Machine Learning Framework for Virtual Screening and Multi-Objective Optimization of Polymer Nanocomposites with Tailored Multifunctional Properties

Abstract
The rational design of polymer nanocomposites with tailored multifunctional properties remains challenging due to complex multi-scale physics and the limitations of traditional empirical approaches, which cannot adequately capture the combinatorial interactions between polymer matrices, nanofillers, and processing conditions. We present a new computational framework for cost-effective virtual screening and optimization of polymer nanocomposites with physically consistent prediction in this series. In a physics-informed neural network, we suggest a combination of the quantum mechanical response, as well as standard molecular dynamics and thermodynamic data. (1) Physics-aware loss functions that incorporate conservation policies and thermodynamic constraints; (2) multiscale descriptor integration of quantum to macroscales; (3) ensemble learning is supplemented by tools to distinguish epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty; and (4) NSGA-III assisted multi-objective optimization coupled with adaptive reference point generation. The neural network architecture consists of multi-branch pathways with 5 hidden layers (256, 512, 512, 256, 128 neurons) using Leaky ReLU activation functions, trained on 23,847 polymer nanocomposite formulations using Adam optimizer (learning rate: 0.001, batch size: 64) with cosine annealing scheduling. The framework achieves prediction accuracies of R² > 0.94 for mechanical properties, R² > 0.91 for thermal characteristics, and R² > 0.88 for electrical conductivity, representing 15-25% improvements over conventional machine learning methods. Virtual screening of 3.2 million candidate formulations identified 1,847 compositions with superior performance. Our NSGA-III optimization identifies Pareto-optimal solutions with 34% higher multifunctional performance than conventional approaches, while reducing experimental validation requirements by 82%. Experimental validation of 127 compositions confirms 89% prediction accuracy within confidence intervals (95% confidence intervals: ±8.3% for mechanical, ±9.1% for thermal, ±11.2% for electrical properties). The present physics-informed machine learning approach enables computational materials design with accounting for the most relevant physical laws and data-driven techniques to discover optimal high-performance polymer nanocomposites yet offers a robust uncertainty quantification to inform risk-conscious design decisions.
Keywords
polymer nanocomposites, physics-informed neural networks, multi-objective optimization, virtual screening, materials informatics, computational materials science
References
- L. Ma, W. Li, J. Yuan, J. Zhu, Y. Wu, H. He, and X. Pan, "Recent advances in machine learning?assisted design and development of polymer materials," Macromol. Rapid Commun., p. e00361, 2025.
- W. Ge, R. De Silva, Y. Fan, S. A. Sisson, and M. H. Stenzel, "Machine learning in polymer research," Adv. Mater., vol. 37, no. 11, p. 2413695, 2025.
- S. Kim, J. Xu, W. Shang, Z. Xu, E. Lee, and T. Luo, "A review on machine learning-guided design of energy materials," Prog. Energy, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 042005, 2024.
- Y. Jia, X. Hou, Z. Wang, and X. Hu, "Machine learning boosts the design and discovery of nanomaterials," ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., vol. 9, no. 18, pp. 6130–6147, 2021.
- H. Wang, H. Cao, and L. Yang, "Machine learning-driven multidomain nanomaterial design: from bibliometric analysis to applications," ACS Appl. Nano Mater., vol. 7, no. 23, pp. 26579–26600, 2024.
- Y. Hu, W. Zhao, L. Wang, J. Lin, and L. Du, "Machine-learning-assisted design of highly tough thermosetting polymers," ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 14, no. 49, pp. 55004–55016, 2022.
- Y. S. AlFaraj, S. Mohapatra, P. Shieh, K. E. L. Husted, D. G. Ivanoff, E. M. Lloyd, J. C. Cooper, et al., "A model ensemble approach enables data-driven property prediction for chemically deconstructable thermosets in the low-data regime," ACS Cent. Sci., vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1810–1819, 2023.
- E. Ricci and M. G. De Angelis, "A perspective on data-driven screening and discovery of polymer membranes for gas separation, from the molecular structure to the industrial performance," Rev. Chem. Eng., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 567–600, 2024.
- S. Basak and A. Bandyopadhyay, "Toward making polymer chemistry autonomous," ACS Appl. Eng. Mater., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1190–1208, 2024.
- S. S. Babu, A.-H. I. Mourad, K. H. Harib, and S. Vijayavenkataraman, "Recent developments in the application of machine-learning towards accelerated predictive multiscale design and additive manufacturing," Virtual Phys. Prototyping, vol. 18, no. 1, p. e2141653, 2023.
- N. H. Kouchehbaghi, M. Yousefzadeh, A. Gharehaghaji, S. Khosravi, D. Khorsandi, R. Haghniaz, K. Cao, et al., "A machine learning-guided design and manufacturing of wearable nanofibrous acoustic energy harvesters," Nano Res., vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 9181–9192, 2024.
- Z. Chen, C. He, K. Wang, F. Rong, L. Xiang, Z. Zuo, C. Wang, et al., "Machine learning-driven molecular generation for accelerated screening of high-performance flame retardants in epoxy resin composites," Chem. Eng. J., p. 163946, 2025.
- P. Hariharasakthisudhan, M. Kandasamy, K. Logesh, and K. Sathickbasha, "Machine learning-guided evolutionary optimization of compression molding parameters for graphene-enhanced jute fiber composites," Fibers Polym., pp. 1–23, 2025.
- Z.-H. Shen, H.-X. Liu, Y. Shen, J.-M. Hu, L.-Q. Chen, and C.-W. Nan, "Machine learning in energy storage materials," Interdiscip. Mater., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 175–195, 2022.
- Q. Wu, Y. Lin, Y. Ou, C. Wang, H. Ma, R. Wang, Y. Li, and X. Zhang, "Two-dimensional carbon/boron nitrides: modification, machine learning and beyond," J. Mater. Chem. A, vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 14302–14333, 2024.
- P. A. Beaucage, D. R. Sutherland, and T. B. Martin, "Automation and machine learning for accelerated polymer characterization and development: past, potential, and a path forward," Macromolecules, vol. 57, no. 18, pp. 8661–8670, 2024.
- L. Fan, H. Yu, Y. He, J. Guo, G. Min, and J. Wang, "Optimization and interpretability analysis of machine learning methods for ZnO colloid particle size prediction," ACS Appl. Nano Mater., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 2682–2692, 2025.
- R. Jayachandiran, S. J. Akkarapakam, and K. Thangavel, "Virtual screening of pharmaceutical cocrystals using machine learning algorithms," Cryst. Growth Des., vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 3100–3109, 2025.
- M. Zhang, Y. Deng, Q. Zhou, J. Gao, D. Zhang, and X. Pan, "Advancing micro-nano supramolecular assembly mechanisms of natural organic matter by machine learning for unveiling environmental geochemical processes," Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 24–45, 2025.
- V. Parambil, U. Tripathi, H. Goyal, and R. Batra, "Polymer property prediction using machine learning," in Materials Informatics III: Polymers, Solvents and Energetic Materials, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, pp. 119–147.
- G. Gan, Q. Liu, G. Leng, Z. Wang, and D. Lai, "Machine learning for predicting tensile properties of fiber-reinforced metal matrix composites," in Proc. 2025 4th Int. Conf. Cyber Security, Artificial Intelligence and the Digital Economy, 2025, pp. 729–733.
- M. M. Nasef and M. H. Habaebi, "Machine learning for accelerating development of ion conducting membranes for fuel cell applications," J. Appl. Membr. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 19–40, 2025.
- S. Xie, "Perspectives on development of biomedical polymer materials in artificial intelligence age," J. Biomater. Appl., vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1355–1375, 2023.
- D. Narvaez and B. Newell, "A review of electroactive polymers in sensing and actuator applications," Actuators, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 258, 2025.