Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Physics-Informed Machine Learning Framework for Virtual Screening and Multi-Objective Optimization of Polymer Nanocomposites with Tailored Multifunctional Properties

Abstract

The rational design of polymer nanocomposites with tailored multifunctional properties remains challenging due to complex multi-scale physics and the limitations of traditional empirical approaches, which cannot adequately capture the combinatorial interactions between polymer matrices, nanofillers, and processing conditions. We present a new computational framework for cost-effective virtual screening and optimization of polymer nanocomposites with physically consistent prediction in this series. In a physics-informed neural network, we suggest a combination of the quantum mechanical response, as well as standard molecular dynamics and thermodynamic data. (1) Physics-aware loss functions that incorporate conservation policies and thermodynamic constraints; (2) multiscale descriptor integration of quantum to macroscales; (3) ensemble learning is supplemented by tools to distinguish epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty; and (4) NSGA-III assisted multi-objective optimization coupled with adaptive reference point generation. The neural network architecture consists of multi-branch pathways with 5 hidden layers (256, 512, 512, 256, 128 neurons) using Leaky ReLU activation functions, trained on 23,847 polymer nanocomposite formulations using Adam optimizer (learning rate: 0.001, batch size: 64) with cosine annealing scheduling. The framework achieves prediction accuracies of R² > 0.94 for mechanical properties, R² > 0.91 for thermal characteristics, and R² > 0.88 for electrical conductivity, representing 15-25% improvements over conventional machine learning methods. Virtual screening of 3.2 million candidate formulations identified 1,847 compositions with superior performance. Our NSGA-III optimization identifies Pareto-optimal solutions with 34% higher multifunctional performance than conventional approaches, while reducing experimental validation requirements by 82%. Experimental validation of 127 compositions confirms 89% prediction accuracy within confidence intervals (95% confidence intervals: ±8.3% for mechanical, ±9.1% for thermal, ±11.2% for electrical properties). The present physics-informed machine learning approach enables computational materials design with accounting for the most relevant physical laws and data-driven techniques to discover optimal high-performance polymer nanocomposites yet offers a robust uncertainty quantification to inform risk-conscious design decisions.

Keywords

polymer nanocomposites, physics-informed neural networks, multi-objective optimization, virtual screening, materials informatics, computational materials science

PDF

References

  1. L. Ma, W. Li, J. Yuan, J. Zhu, Y. Wu, H. He, and X. Pan, "Recent advances in machine learning?assisted design and development of polymer materials," Macromol. Rapid Commun., p. e00361, 2025.
  2. W. Ge, R. De Silva, Y. Fan, S. A. Sisson, and M. H. Stenzel, "Machine learning in polymer research," Adv. Mater., vol. 37, no. 11, p. 2413695, 2025.
  3. S. Kim, J. Xu, W. Shang, Z. Xu, E. Lee, and T. Luo, "A review on machine learning-guided design of energy materials," Prog. Energy, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 042005, 2024.
  4. Y. Jia, X. Hou, Z. Wang, and X. Hu, "Machine learning boosts the design and discovery of nanomaterials," ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., vol. 9, no. 18, pp. 6130–6147, 2021.
  5. H. Wang, H. Cao, and L. Yang, "Machine learning-driven multidomain nanomaterial design: from bibliometric analysis to applications," ACS Appl. Nano Mater., vol. 7, no. 23, pp. 26579–26600, 2024.
  6. Y. Hu, W. Zhao, L. Wang, J. Lin, and L. Du, "Machine-learning-assisted design of highly tough thermosetting polymers," ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 14, no. 49, pp. 55004–55016, 2022.
  7. Y. S. AlFaraj, S. Mohapatra, P. Shieh, K. E. L. Husted, D. G. Ivanoff, E. M. Lloyd, J. C. Cooper, et al., "A model ensemble approach enables data-driven property prediction for chemically deconstructable thermosets in the low-data regime," ACS Cent. Sci., vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1810–1819, 2023.
  8. E. Ricci and M. G. De Angelis, "A perspective on data-driven screening and discovery of polymer membranes for gas separation, from the molecular structure to the industrial performance," Rev. Chem. Eng., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 567–600, 2024.
  9. S. Basak and A. Bandyopadhyay, "Toward making polymer chemistry autonomous," ACS Appl. Eng. Mater., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1190–1208, 2024.
  10. S. S. Babu, A.-H. I. Mourad, K. H. Harib, and S. Vijayavenkataraman, "Recent developments in the application of machine-learning towards accelerated predictive multiscale design and additive manufacturing," Virtual Phys. Prototyping, vol. 18, no. 1, p. e2141653, 2023.
  11. N. H. Kouchehbaghi, M. Yousefzadeh, A. Gharehaghaji, S. Khosravi, D. Khorsandi, R. Haghniaz, K. Cao, et al., "A machine learning-guided design and manufacturing of wearable nanofibrous acoustic energy harvesters," Nano Res., vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 9181–9192, 2024.
  12. Z. Chen, C. He, K. Wang, F. Rong, L. Xiang, Z. Zuo, C. Wang, et al., "Machine learning-driven molecular generation for accelerated screening of high-performance flame retardants in epoxy resin composites," Chem. Eng. J., p. 163946, 2025.
  13. P. Hariharasakthisudhan, M. Kandasamy, K. Logesh, and K. Sathickbasha, "Machine learning-guided evolutionary optimization of compression molding parameters for graphene-enhanced jute fiber composites," Fibers Polym., pp. 1–23, 2025.
  14. Z.-H. Shen, H.-X. Liu, Y. Shen, J.-M. Hu, L.-Q. Chen, and C.-W. Nan, "Machine learning in energy storage materials," Interdiscip. Mater., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 175–195, 2022.
  15. Q. Wu, Y. Lin, Y. Ou, C. Wang, H. Ma, R. Wang, Y. Li, and X. Zhang, "Two-dimensional carbon/boron nitrides: modification, machine learning and beyond," J. Mater. Chem. A, vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 14302–14333, 2024.
  16. P. A. Beaucage, D. R. Sutherland, and T. B. Martin, "Automation and machine learning for accelerated polymer characterization and development: past, potential, and a path forward," Macromolecules, vol. 57, no. 18, pp. 8661–8670, 2024.
  17. L. Fan, H. Yu, Y. He, J. Guo, G. Min, and J. Wang, "Optimization and interpretability analysis of machine learning methods for ZnO colloid particle size prediction," ACS Appl. Nano Mater., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 2682–2692, 2025.
  18. R. Jayachandiran, S. J. Akkarapakam, and K. Thangavel, "Virtual screening of pharmaceutical cocrystals using machine learning algorithms," Cryst. Growth Des., vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 3100–3109, 2025.
  19. M. Zhang, Y. Deng, Q. Zhou, J. Gao, D. Zhang, and X. Pan, "Advancing micro-nano supramolecular assembly mechanisms of natural organic matter by machine learning for unveiling environmental geochemical processes," Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 24–45, 2025.
  20. V. Parambil, U. Tripathi, H. Goyal, and R. Batra, "Polymer property prediction using machine learning," in Materials Informatics III: Polymers, Solvents and Energetic Materials, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, pp. 119–147.
  21. G. Gan, Q. Liu, G. Leng, Z. Wang, and D. Lai, "Machine learning for predicting tensile properties of fiber-reinforced metal matrix composites," in Proc. 2025 4th Int. Conf. Cyber Security, Artificial Intelligence and the Digital Economy, 2025, pp. 729–733.
  22. M. M. Nasef and M. H. Habaebi, "Machine learning for accelerating development of ion conducting membranes for fuel cell applications," J. Appl. Membr. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 19–40, 2025.
  23. S. Xie, "Perspectives on development of biomedical polymer materials in artificial intelligence age," J. Biomater. Appl., vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1355–1375, 2023.
  24. D. Narvaez and B. Newell, "A review of electroactive polymers in sensing and actuator applications," Actuators, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 258, 2025.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

31-40 of 69

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.