Security Checkpoints at University Campus Entrances and Their Impact on Social Integration: A Case Study of the University of Wasit
Abstract
Historically, universities are more of an open social and cultural system where interaction, accessibility, and engagement among neighbors are favored. Rise in pressure on security has seen most institutions adopt policies on physical control like security checkpoints at college gates. These interventions are supposed to improve the safety but might create some physical and psychological distance between the universities and the city. In this paper, the researcher will assess how security checkpoints influence the perceived Spatial and Social Impact of Security Checkpoints at University Campus Entrances: A Case Study of the University of Wasit. A combined mixed-method design was employed, creating a spatial analysis of four campus entry points and a structured survey of a questionnaire consisting of more than 40 questions, which was implemented among the students, employees, visitors, and residents of the location. The results show that security checkpoints boost perceived safety in internal users to a great extent. Nevertheless, they diminish the spatial receptivity as well as limit free motion and inhibit impromptu social manifestation. The indicators of social integration, especially the sense of belonging and interaction, have always registered low scores. The non-student users of the campus find it to be hard to enter and very monitored, which further assists in the perception of social and spatial isolation. The research outcomes are based on the findings suggests that although security checkpoints address protective goals, their design and functioning have the significant impact on the campus experience and campus-community relationships. It claims transparency in the checkpoint design; dispersed entrances and well balanced security measures will enhance the social connectivity without jeopardizing security.
Keywords
Social integration, university campus, security checkpoints, urban barriers
References
- Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2010). Trends in Global Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004406155
- AMECWU. (2026). Access map for exam centers at Wasit University. Wasit University website RSS2. https://uowasit.edu.iq/old/en/examination-centers-in-wasit-university-2/
- Averdijk, M. (2010). Reciprocal effects of victimization and routine activities. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27(2), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9106-6
- Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877
- Coleman, R. (2004). Images from a neoliberal city: The state, Surveillance and Social Control. Critical Criminology, 12(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:crit.0000024443.08828.d8
- Cozens, P. M., Saville, G., & Hillier, D. (2005). Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED): A Review and modern bibliography. Property Management, 23(5), 328–356. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637470510631483
- Curti, G. H. (2008). From a wall of bodies to a body of walls: Emotion, Space and Society, 1(2), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.02.002
- De Vaus, D., & de Vaus, D. (2013). Surveys in Social Research. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203519196
- Dovey, K. (2002). Framing Places. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203017579
- Ellin, N. (2013). Integral Urbanism. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203956854
- Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban Design, 14(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802451155
- Fong, L., & Law, R. (2013). Hair, J. F. Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1-4522-1744-4. 307 pp. European Journal of Tourism Research, 6(2), 211–213. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v6i2.134
- Gehl, J., & Svarre, B. (2013). How to Study Public Life. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-525-0
- Gifford, R. (2016). Introduction. Research Methods for Environmental Psychology, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119162124.ch1
- Giglioli, I. (2012). Cities under siege: The new military urbanism, by Stephen Graham. Berkeley Planning Journal, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/bp325111854
- Hajrasouliha, A. (2017). Campus score: Measuring university campus qualities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.007
- Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511597237
- Jackson, J. (2009). A psychological perspective on vulnerability in the fear of crime. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(4), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802275797
- Kitchen, T., & Schneider, R. H. (2007). Crime Prevention and the Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203098813
- Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/Space. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001
- Mehta, V. (2013). Evaluating public space. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 53–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698
- Montello, D., & Sutton, P. (2006). An Introduction to Scientific Research Methods in Geography. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452225814
- Porta, S., Crucitti, P., & Latora, V. (2006). The network analysis of Urban Streets: A primal approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(5), 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32045
- Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-First Century the 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
- Rapoport, A. (2019). Culture and built form - a reconsideration. Culture-Meaning-Architecture, 175–216. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315200248-10
- Tinto, V. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2190/4ynu-4tmb-22dj-an4w
- UWMSSV. (2026). University of Wasit location, maps, satellite and street views. uniRank. https://www.unirank.org/iq/uni/university-of-wasit/map/
- Van Melik, R., Van Aalst, I., & Van Weesep, J. (2009). The private sector and public space in Dutch city centres. Cities, 26(4), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.04.002
- WUE. (2026). Wasit University Entrance. Amarseen. https://amarseen.com/wasit-university-entrance
- Yiftachel, O. (2009). Theoretical notes on `gray cities’: The coming of urban apartheid? Planning Theory, 8(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099300.